Show simple item record

Surface complexation models: An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data

dc.contributor.authorHayes, Kim F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRedden, Georgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorEla, Wendellen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeckie, James O.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T14:46:49Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T14:46:49Z
dc.date.issued1991-03-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationHayes, Kim F., Redden, George, Ela, Wendell, Leckie, James O. (1991/03/15)."Surface complexation models: An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data." Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 142(2): 448-469. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29417>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WHR-4CX6RX7-F5/2/6d9e36fe80cd56ea65d047271ce02b92en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29417
dc.description.abstractThe ability of surface complexation models (SCMs) to fit sets of titration data as a function of changes in model parameters was evaluated using FITEQL and acid-base titration data of [alpha]-FeOOH, [alpha]-Al2O3, and TiO2. Three SCMs were evaluated: the triple-layer model (TLM), the constant capacitance model (CCM), and the diffuse-layer model (DLM). For all models evaluated, increasing the model input value for the total number of surface sites caused a decrease in the best-fit Log K values of the surface protolysis constants. In the case of the CCM, the best-fit surface protolysis constants were relatively insensitive to changes in the value of the capacitance fitting parameter, C1, particularly for values of C1 greater than 1.2 F/m2. Similarly, the best-fit values of TLM surface electrolyte binding constants were less influenced by changes in the value of C1 when C1 was greater than 1.2 F/m2. For a given C1 value, the best-fit TLM values of the electrolyte binding constants were sensitive to changes in [Delta]pKa up to [Delta]pKa values of 3. For [Delta]pKa values above 3, no changes in the best-fit electrolyte binding constants were observed. Effects of the quality and extent of titration data on the best-fit values for surface constants are discussed for each model. A method is suggested for choosing a unique set of parameter values for each of the models.en_US
dc.format.extent1698452 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleSurface complexation models: An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEnvironmental and Water Resources Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2125, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnvironmental Engineering and Science, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnvironmental Engineering and Science, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnvironmental Engineering and Science, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29417/1/0000493.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(91)90075-Jen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Colloid and Interface Scienceen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.