Show simple item record

Brain structure localization in positron emission tomography: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and a stereotactic method

dc.contributor.authorMountz, James M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Mark W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T14:50:56Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T14:50:56Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.citationMountz, James M., Wilson, Mark W. (1991)."Brain structure localization in positron emission tomography: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and a stereotactic method." Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 15(1): 17-22. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29520>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T5K-4C4FHNJ-J/2/ae6292de2b013ec484aa577eee677aeaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29520
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2009493&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA method commonly used for localization of brain regions on positron emission tomographic (PET) images is direct visualization and designation of structure on the image itself. This technique, however, is limited to portions of the brain having sufficient differential radionuclide uptake to permit the recognition of structure by observers familiar with brain anatomy. Two other methods commonly used instead of direct visualization are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and stereotactic methods of localization. This report compares the accuracy of a MRI method versus a stereotactic method of brain structure localization on PET. The three localization methods were analyzed for sixteen different brain regions in 5 different subjects by two independent observers. The results were converted to PET pixel size (1 PIXEL=.127 cm) for comparison. MRI localization differed from direct visualization by a mean and standard deviation of ~2+/-1 pixels in both the X and Y dimensions. Stereotactic localization differed from direct visualization by ~2+/-1 pixels in the X dimension and by ~6+/-2 pixels in the Y dimension. This larger variation seen with the stereotactic method may be, attributed to the questionable assumption of linearity of structure location with respect to size of the inner table of the calvarium.en_US
dc.format.extent750324 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleBrain structure localization in positron emission tomography: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and a stereotactic methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Careen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid2009493en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29520/1/0000607.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-6111(91)90102-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.