Show simple item record

A comparison of staging systems for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

dc.contributor.authorHopkins, Michael P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReid, Gary C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Carolyn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorley, George W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:02:53Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:02:53Z
dc.date.issued1992-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationHopkins, Michael P., Reid, Gary C., Johnston, Caroline M., Morley, George W. (1992/10)."A comparison of staging systems for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva." Gynecologic Oncology 47(1): 34-37. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29798>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WG6-4C52FMV-C3/2/1ea3d479e264628a5325a1cf0f7dc2aaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29798
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1427397&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA review of 172 patients with squamous cell cancer of the vulva treated at the University of Michigan Medical Center from 1975-1989 was performed to compare the 1988 FIGO Staging System to the 1970 FIGO Staging System. The stage distribution according to the 1970 FIGO Staging System was stage I, 65; stage II, 44; stage III, 50; and stage IV, 13. The cumulative 5-year survival under the old system was stage I, 94%; stage II, 91%; stage III, 36%; and stage IV, 26%. The distribution changed under the 1988 FIGO system to stage I, 58; stage II, 36; stage III, 49; stage IVA, 16; and stage IVB, 13. The cumulative survival also changed to stage I, 94%; stage II, 89%; stage III, 71%; stage IVA, 19%; and stage IVB, 8%. The new FIGO stage distribution shifted for the worse due to the influence of positive lymph nodes found at the time of surgery. The survival was then analyzed for death from all causes. This was markedly decreased when compared to the cumulative corrected survival. This relates to the high number of other primary malignancies and the age of the patients. Among these 172 patients, other primary malignancies included squamous cell cancer of the cervix (11), squamous cell cancer of the vagina (2), endometrial cancer (3), squamous cell cancer of the lung (2), colon cancer (3), and others (6). An additional 5 patients died from myocardial infarction within 2 years of diagnosis. The new 1988 FIGO Staging System provides for better discrimination of survival between stages than the 1970 FIGO Staging System.en_US
dc.format.extent383051 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleA comparison of staging systems for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulvaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid1427397en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29798/1/0000144.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(92)90071-Pen_US
dc.identifier.sourceGynecologic Oncologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.