Show simple item record

Roman polygyny

dc.contributor.authorBetzig, Lauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:06:07Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:06:07Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationBetzig, Laura (1992)."Roman polygyny." Ethology and Sociobiology 13(5-6): 309-349. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29873>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X2B-45XSNM2-1D/2/6d9497c8f09aec85752e776ecf1ef0d7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29873
dc.description.abstractMarriage in Rome was monogamous; mating was polygynous. Powerful men in the Roman empire, as in other empires, probably had sex with more women. To make that case I look, first, at the Latin sources. Tacitus, Suetonius, and Cassius Dio suggest that Roman emperors, like other emperors, were promiscuous; that they had privileged access to other men's women; and that they sometimes had women procured for them. I look next at the modern studies. Literary, legal, and inscriptional data suggest that Roman men kept as many slaves as they could afford--often hundreds and sometimes thousands; that many of those slaves were women; and that slave women were often bought as breeders. They also suggest that masters, who had unrestricted sexual access to their slaves, were often the fathers. Some slave women's children were brought up with, and in the style of, legitimate children; they were freed young; and they were given wealth, position, and paternal affection.en_US
dc.format.extent3258659 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleRoman polygynyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEvolution & Human Behavior Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29873/1/0000222.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90008-Ren_US
dc.identifier.sourceEthology and Sociobiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.