Show simple item record

Effect of maximal medical therapy on refractoriness of unstable angina pectoris

dc.contributor.authorGrambow, David W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTopol, Eric J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:06:37Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:06:37Z
dc.date.issued1992-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationGrambow, David W., Topol, Eric J. (1992/09/01)."Effect of maximal medical therapy on refractoriness of unstable angina pectoris." The American Journal of Cardiology 70(6): 577-581. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29885>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T10-4FWD9FS-5Y/2/93493ac0de8514993448f5faf4f9dbb7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29885
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1354937&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA group of 125 patients with unstable angina were studied over a 5-year period to define the incidence of refractory unstable angina in the current era of 5-drug medical therapy with intravenous heparin, aspirin, nitrates, calcium antagonists and[beta] blockers. All patients had &gt;20 minutes of chest pain at rest with reversible electrocardiographic changes occurring in the absence of myocardial infarction. Patients were considered refractory only if chest pain continued despite treatment with maximal 5-drug therapy. At the time of transfer to the center, 65 patients continued to have ischemic chest pain at rest and were considered "medically refractory" by their referring physicians. A more aggressive medical regimen was used, and 54 patients (83%) were rendered chest pain-free. Of the 11 truly refractory patients (8.8%), coronary arteriography revealed an increased likelihood of left main or 3-vessel disease (7 of 11 vs 26 of 114; P = 0.01). Inhospital treatment strategies for the 114 patients stabilized with medical therapy included continued medical therapy (n = 37), coronary angioplasty (n = 46) and bypass grafting (n = 31). The rate of myocardial infarction or death in patients managed medically was 3%. Coronary angioplasty in medically stabilized patients was complicated by an abrupt closure rate of 26%, and a 17% rate of myocardial infarction, death or need for emergency bypass grafting. Medically stabilized patients undergoing bypass grafting had a 9% rate of myocardial infarction or death. Unstable angina truly refractory to current, maximal medical therapy is infrequent (8.8%). However, the refractory group is vulnerable to adverse angioplasty results and cardiac events.en_US
dc.format.extent654399 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleEffect of maximal medical therapy on refractoriness of unstable angina pectorisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid1354937en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29885/1/0000238.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90194-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Cardiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.