Show simple item record

The effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretation

dc.contributor.authorJankowiak, William R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHill, Elizabeth M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, James M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:18:04Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:18:04Z
dc.date.issued1992-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationJankowiak, William R., Hill, Elizabeth M., Donovan, James M. (1992/03)."The effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretation." Ethology and Sociobiology 13(2): 73-85. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30162>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X2B-45Y7TNX-19/2/3e301f27cfd1c3dd6144067678765589en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30162
dc.description.abstractIf attractiveness judgments reflect biologically important reproductive criteria, men should base judgments of potential partners on objective physical criteria more than do women; homosexuals and heterosexuals of the same sex should perceive attractiveness in the same terms, regardless of sex-object choice. To test this theory, photographs of men and women (20 each) were presented to members of four subject groups, solicited on an opportunistic basis. Subjects were asked to rank the sets of photographs separately on the dimensions of physical attractiveness and general social attractiveness. We found some sex differences across sexual orientation. There was less variation among men than women (heterosexual and homosexual) in evaluating the "good looks" of sex objects. Heterosexual and homosexual men ranked younger sex objects higher than older ones on "good looks." Heterosexual but not homosexual women ranked older sex objects higher. Sex had little effect on "social attractiveness" rankings, nor did putative age. These findings are interpreted as generally consistent with the existence of average sex differences in evaluative mechanisms that reflect different reproductive interests. Only further research, however, can identify the developmental origins of such differences.en_US
dc.format.extent930087 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleThe effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30162/1/0000546.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90019-Zen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEthology and Sociobiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.