Show simple item record

Anaerobic bacteremia: Incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significance

dc.contributor.authorLombardi, Donald P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEngleberg, Niels Caryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:23:04Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:23:04Z
dc.date.issued1992-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLombardi, Donald P., Engleberg, N. Cary (1992/01)."Anaerobic bacteremia: Incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significance." The American Journal of Medicine 92(1): 53-60. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30281>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TDC-4CHHJ5D-3G/2/a1e296e9417ea0fcad43747df2f9755den_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30281
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1731510&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the 1970s, blood culture for obligate anaerobic bacteria became routine in most United States hospitals. Since then, various authorities have reported isolation of obligate anaerobes in 5% to 25% of blood cultures. Our experience suggests a much lower frequency, therefore, we retrospectively assessed the occurrence and significance of these cultures at our institutions. Sixty-six patients at the University of Michigan Hospitals (UMH) and nine patients at the Ann Arbor Veteran's Administration Medical Center (AAVAMC) had one or more blood cultures positive for an obligate anaerobe between July 1, 1987, and December 31, 1988. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The proportion of positive blood cultures yielding obligate anaerobes was 3.2% at the UMH and 1.8% at the AAVAMC. The incidences of clinically significant anaerobic bacteremia at the two hospitals were 0.68 and 0.54 cases per 1,000 patient admissions. Among the 40 patients from whom significant isolates were obtained, 15 (38%) had a fatal outcome. Bacteroides and Clostridium species accounted for 90% of the isolates and all of the fatal cases. The source for anaerobic bacteremia was usually obvious; 30 of the 40 patients were given empiric antibiotic therapy for anaerobes. The gastrointestinal tract was the source in two thirds of the cases and was clearly implicated as the source of 80% of the fatal bacteremias. The frequency of anaerobic bacteremia in our hospitals is much lower than was suggested in several large studies during the 1970s, probably reflecting a real decline in the incidence. The clinical features of our cases are similar to those of previous studies, and the mortality is still high despite the use of antibiotics effective against anaerobes. Since most patients were thought to have anaerobic infections at the time that cultures were obtained, they were usually treated empirically. Subsequent blood cultures positive for anaerobes infrequently influenced clinical management.en_US
dc.format.extent1005862 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleAnaerobic bacteremia: Incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Careen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid1731510en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30281/1/0000682.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(92)90015-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.