Show simple item record

Precision of and new methods for testing in vitro alloy cytotoxicity

dc.contributor.authorWataha, John C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Robert G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHanks, Carl T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:23:16Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:23:16Z
dc.date.issued1992-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationWataha, J. C., Craig, R. G., Hanks, C. T. (1992/01)."Precision of and new methods for testing in vitro alloy cytotoxicity." Dental Materials 8(1): 65-70. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30285>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VP3-48G6YPJ-6V/2/85e5aaaa37a3ccddfd9339ca9623f6e4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30285
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1521687&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have utilized in vitro alloy cytotoxicity tests to evaluate dental casting alloys. The purposes of this study were to: (1) evaluate the precision of the optical density and visual tests previously used, (2) evaluate a new test measuring absorbance of solubilized formazan dyes, and (3) test the correlation between these tests for cytotoxicity. Balb/c 3T3 cells were plated in 24-well culture trays at 25,000 cells/cm2 around ten types of dental casting alloy (six samples/alloy) and incubated for 72 h. Cells were histochemically stained with MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) succinate for 2 h, then fixed, washed, and dried. Toxicity was measured by optical densitometer (OD) scanning, visual assessment, and 560-nm absorbance of DMSO-solubilized dyes. Measurements of rings of inhibition were not used, because they did not provide precise data, and correlated poorly with the other methods. The results were analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey intervals, and coefficients of variation (CV's). MTT required shorter incubation times for adequate staining, allowed for solubilization of the monolayers, and was less expensive than NBT (2,2'-di-p-nitro-phenyl-5,5'-diphenyl-3,3'-dimethoxy-[3,3'-dimethoxy-4,4'-biphenylene] ditetrazolium chloride). Results showed that all three methods ranked alloy toxicities similarly (p = 0.05). The solubilization method was most discriminating due to lower CV's. Correlation between densitometer and solubilization methods was excellent (R2 = 0.96). Between-experiment CV's were generally less than 20%, and often less than 10%. Between-sample CV;s were generally less than 20%. CV's were consistently lower for the solubilization method. Thus, all methods were repeatable and correlated well, but the solubilization method was more precise and discriminating.en_US
dc.format.extent795372 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titlePrecision of and new methods for testing in vitro alloy cytotoxicityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Oral Pathology, Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid1521687en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30285/1/0000687.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90056-Ien_US
dc.identifier.sourceDental Materialsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.