Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
dc.contributor.author | De Cesare, Nicoletta B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Williamson, Paula R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Noel B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | DeBoe, Scott F. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mancini, G. B. John | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T15:23:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T15:23:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1992-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | de Cesare, Nicoletta B., Williamson, Paula R., Moore, Noel B., DeBoe, Scott F., Mancini, G. B. John (1992/01/01)."Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty." The American Journal of Cardiology 69(1): 77-83. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30287> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T10-4C7VH5J-BN/2/c2589f6607ab2c33b36086964439bb90 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30287 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1729871&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | To establish comprehensive criteria for detecting restenosis and remodeling, inter- and intraobserver reproducibiltty of quantitative arteriography in the analysis of 20 lesions immediately after and 6 months after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were assessed. Geometric single-plane (minimum, maximum, mean diameter and percent diameter stenosis), biplane (absolute and relative cross-sectional area stenosis), relative densitometric area stenosis and the average of densitometric area stenosis in orthogonal views were compared. A high intra- and interobserver reproducibility of all absolute measurements was found, with the highest correlations for minimum diameter and cross-sectional area (interobserver, R = 0.85 and 0.85; intraobserver, R = 0.93, and 0.95 for minimum diameter and cross-sectional area, respectively). Of the relative measurements, biplane geometric percent crosssectional area stenosis was the most reliable and percent densitometric area stenosis was the most variable (Interobserver, R = 0.67; intraobserver, R = 0.71). Only small differences were demonstrated for the absolute measurements between the analysis of lesions immediately after PTCA and after follow-up, whereas a greater variability was found for relative measurements, especially videodensitometry. In both circumstances, a poor correlation between relative densitometric crosssectional area from orthogonal views was found, whereas geometric elliptical cross-sectional area correlated quite well with the average of densitometric percent cross-sectional area in orthogonal views (interobserver, R = 0.86; intraobserver, R = 0.84). Thus, data in this study support the suitability of geometric quantitative analysis for the assessment of PTCA results. Densitometry was the least reliable quantitative parameter. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 824617 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Administration and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Administration and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Administration and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Administration and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Administration and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 1729871 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30287/1/0000689.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90679-S | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | The American Journal of Cardiology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.