Show simple item record

Degradation of polyurethanes in vitro and in vitro: comparison of different models

dc.contributor.authorFrautschi, Jack R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChinn, Joseph A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Jr. , Richard E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Q. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, James M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Ravi R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Robert J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:30:46Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:30:46Z
dc.date.issued1993-11-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrautschi, Jack R., Chinn, Joseph A., Phillips, Jr., Richard E., Zhao, Q. H., Anderson, James M., Joshi, Ravi, Levy, Robert J. (1993/11/08)."Degradation of polyurethanes in vitro and in vitro: comparison of different models." Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 1(5): 305-313. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30454>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TFS-44FMN24-10/2/e7b53ee85fb92b235fca02e4fe395625en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30454
dc.description.abstractThis study compares and contrasts mechanisms of polyetherurethane (PEU) degradation in vitro and in vivo. Models comprising incubation with hydrogen peroxide in vitro (H2O2), in vivo subcutaneous rat implant (SUBQ), and subcutaneous rat cage implant (CAGE) are described and compared with in vivo degradation of the pacemaker lead device retrieved after human implant (PACE). Experimental results support the hypothesis that stress accelerates PEU degradation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and Fourier transform IR spectroscopy/attenuated total reflectance (FT-1R/ATR) evaluation of tested PEU samples suggests, for all models, decreased soft segment and increased ester functionality at the polymer surface. These observations are consistent with a single, metal ion catalyzed, polyester intermediate, oxidative degradation mechanism common to all models, and with device performance in vivo. Model comparison suggests that in vitro H2O2 and in vivo SUBQ and CAGE models accurately mimic in vivo degradation of the pacemaker lead device (PACE).en_US
dc.format.extent962141 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDegradation of polyurethanes in vitro and in vitro: comparison of different modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0576, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0576, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarboMedics, 1300 B East Anderson Lane, Austin, TX 78752-1793, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarboMedics, 1300 B East Anderson Lane, Austin, TX 78752-1793, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarboMedics, 1300 B East Anderson Lane, Austin, TX 78752-1793, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Macromolecular Science and Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Macromolecular Science and Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30454/1/0000080.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-7765(93)80005-Jen_US
dc.identifier.sourceColloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfacesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.