Show simple item record

Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea

dc.contributor.authorMoon, Andrew K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZwolan, Teresa A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPfingst, Bryan E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:46:01Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:46:01Z
dc.date.issued1993-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationMoon, Andrew K., Zwolan, Teresa A., Pfingst, Bryan E. (1993/05)."Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea." Hearing Research 67(1-2): 166-178. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30807>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T73-4859N5P-18/2/5fcc0e7c39cb124fb2bdb90dbbed1ba7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30807
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8340268&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractDetection thresholds for biphasic symmetric pulses were measured in fourteen human subjects implanted with the Cochlear Corporation Nucleus 22 Implant. The effects of phase duration on thresholds were studied using single pulses, and 500 ms pulse trains at 100 pps. Psychophysical detection thresholds decreased as a function of phase duration with a change in slope at approximately 0.5 ms/phase. Mean single-pulse and pulse-train slopes were -3.60 and -4.25 dB/doubling of phase duration for pulse durations of less than about 0.5 ms/phase. For pulse durations greater than 0.5 ms/phase, mean slopes were -5.71 and -7.54 dB/doubling for single pulses and pulse trains, respectively. Thresholds for pulse trains decreased as a function of stimulus duration for durations up to at least 300 ms, with the rate of decrease being dependent on the phase duration of the pulse. Effects of stimulus duration were greater for longer phase duration signals. We hypothesize that the longer phase duration pulses activate multiple spikes in a single fiber and/or more effective patterns of spikes across fibers, which may explain why slopes of psychophysical threshold functions are steeper than those of functions for single auditory nerve fibers for longer duration pulses. Thresholds were compared to respective speech perception scores (CID sentences) since thresholds for long phase duration signals have been shown previously to be correlated with nerve survival patterns, and nerve survival patterns may affect speech perception. Correlation coefficients ranged from -0.59 to -0.81, depending on stimulus parameters and subject selection.en_US
dc.format.extent1570533 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleEffects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochleaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid8340268en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30807/1/0000465.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(93)90244-Uen_US
dc.identifier.sourceHearing Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.