Show simple item record

Dobutamine stress echocardiography: Prevalence of a nonischemic response in a low-risk population

dc.contributor.authorBach, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHepner, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcovitz, Pamela A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, William F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:46:55Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:46:55Z
dc.date.issued1993-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationBach, David S., Hepner, Anne, Marcovitz, Pamela A., Armstrong, William F. (1993/05)."Dobutamine stress echocardiography: Prevalence of a nonischemic response in a low-risk population." American Heart Journal 125(5, Part 1): 1257-1261. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30826>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9H-4BV45V9-6B/2/eb1962e15aab1a0de9c312db6da4193den_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30826
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8480576&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe problems of population referral bias in the calculation of specificity in diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease have been previously described. Previous studies investigating the sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) have been subject to pretest and posttest referral biases, largely as a result of the requirement for coronary arteriography. This study determines the normalcy rate for DSE by examining a population at statistically low risk for coronary artery disease. The probability of significant coronary artery disease was determined for 828 consecutive patients referred for DSE at the University of Michigan, and groups were identified with &lt;10% and &lt;5% probability of disease. Four of 72 patients (5.6%) with a normal baseline echocardiogram and a probability of coronary artery disease of &lt;10%, and three of 38 (7.9%) with a probability of &lt;5% were found to have an abnormal DSE, yielding normalcy rates of 94.4% and 92.1%, respectively. The area of abnormality involved the posterior circulation in three of four patients (75%). This study demonstrates that DSE has a normalcy rate of 92% to 94% and is an accurate test for excluding the presence of significant coronary artery disease.en_US
dc.format.extent641159 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDobutamine stress echocardiography: Prevalence of a nonischemic response in a low-risk populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid8480576en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30826/1/0000488.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(93)90992-Ien_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Heart Journalen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.