Show simple item record

Do bone ingrowth processes produce a globally optimized structure?

dc.contributor.authorHollister, Scott J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKikuchi, Noboruen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Steven A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:49:29Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:49:29Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.citationHollister, S. J., Kikuchi, N., Goldstein, S. A. (1993)."Do bone ingrowth processes produce a globally optimized structure?." Journal of Biomechanics 26(4-5): 391-407. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30884>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T82-4BYSJJ9-17S/2/d7a62f0f95c4264f703227248c192df4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30884
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8478344&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA topology optimization program was applied to test the hypothesis that bone adaptation to porous coated implants produces a structure which minimizes the global strain energy density. The program was used to predict the optimal material layout around a porous coated tibial component with multiple cones [Goldstein et al., Trans. 37th ORS, p. 92 (1991)]. The sensitivity of the predicted adaptation to analysis assumptions was assessed and the predicted bone ingrowth and apposition were compared with the experimental findings of Goldstein et al. The results showed that apposition occurred consistently at the cone tips regardless of analysis assumptions. The specific topology of apposition at the cone tips was most sensitive to the assumed loading conditions. A comparison with the experimental results for 11 subdivisions showed that the general predicted location of material agreed with the experimental results (R2&gt;=0.59). However, the program predicted a consolidated bone greater than 1000 [mu]m in thickness at the cone tips, which differed from the porous bone structure found experimentally. This discrepancy was reflected in a refined comparison over 31 subdivisions which did not produce a significant correlation (R2&lt;=0.3). The program also predicted little ingrowth (&lt;6-7%), indicating that ingrowth past the first bead layer contributed little to the overall bone-implant interface layer stiffness. Based on these results, we conclude, within limitations of a two-dimensional analysis, that bone adaptation to porous coated implants does not produce a structure solely optimized to minimize the global strain energy density. We hypothesize that the final bone structure reflects the need to meet both mechanical and nutritional demands.en_US
dc.format.extent1609080 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDo bone ingrowth processes produce a globally optimized structure?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sportsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumComputational Mechanics Laboratory, The Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid8478344en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30884/1/0000550.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90003-Wen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Biomechanicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.