Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging,
dc.contributor.author | Dootz, E. R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Koran, Andrew | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Craig, Robert G. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T15:55:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T15:55:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1993-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Dootz, E. R., Koran, A., Craig, R. G. (1993/01)."Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging,." The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 69(1): 114-119. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31019> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WKW-4FTPMKW-S/2/295528b4492f4de2456a6a3a907176ef | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8455156&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Soft denture-lining materials are an important treatment option for patients who have chronic soreness associated with dental prostheses. Three distinctly different types of materials are generally used. These are plasticized polymers or copolymers, silicones, or polyphosphazene fluoroelastomer. The acceptance of these materials by patients and dentists is variable. The objective of this study is to compare the tensile strength, percent elongation, hardness, tear strength, and tear energy of eight plasticized polymers or copolymers, two silicones, and one polyphosphazene fluoroelastomer. Tests were run at 24 hours after specimen preparation and repeated after 900 hours of accelerated aging in a Weather-Ometer device. The data indicated a wide range of physical properties for soft denturelining materials and showed that accelerated aging dramatically affected the physical and mechanical properties of many of the elastomers. No soft denture liner proved to be superior to all others. The data obtained should provide clinicians with useful information for selecting soft denture lining materials for patients. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 528683 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging, | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 8455156 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/31019/1/0000695.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90250-R | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.