Show simple item record

Hard Choices: The Gynecologic Cancer Patient's End-of-Life Preferences

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Douglasen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, James A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorElkins, Thomas E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLarson, David E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, Michael P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T17:43:23Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T17:43:23Z
dc.date.issued1994-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrown, Douglas, Roberts, James A., Elkins, Thomas E., Larson, David, Hopkins, Michael (1994/12)."Hard Choices: The Gynecologic Cancer Patient's End-of-Life Preferences." Gynecologic Oncology 55(3): 355-362. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31154>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WG6-45NJYDH-8/2/77d1a4a7544629cef1433226080de5e3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31154
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7835774&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractFew reports in gynecologic literature have addressed patient preferences about terminal care. In light of the current discussions about end-of-life decision-making, a study was designed to assess the desires of patients with gynecologic cancer. A questionnaire was completed by 108 patients under treatment for gynecologic cancer at the University of Michigan Medical Center and by 39 patients from the routine gynecology clinic at the same institution. Participants were asked about their reactions to a poor prognosis, their desires for the location of terminal care, and their preferences for withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining technologies. Five percent of these cancer patients anticipated giving up the fight against their disease. Seventy-eight percent specifically expressed resolve to continue the fight against their disease. Feedback from these patients about their end-of-life preferences served to define the concept "fight." A majority preferred to receive care at home. Ninety percent of these cancer patients could envision their conditions deteriorating to the point that they would not want ventilator support. Thirty-four percent could envision refusing surgery for another life-threatening condition; 37%, a time when artificial nutrition would be refused; 22%, a time when antibiotics would be rejected. This study suggests that limiting the use of artificial respiratory support while continuing the use of artificial nutrition and hydration support would be consistent with the preferences of gynecologic cancer with end-stage disease.en_US
dc.format.extent363796 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleHard Choices: The Gynecologic Cancer Patient's End-of-Life Preferencesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70803, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northeastern Ohio University, Rootstown, Ohio 44272, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid7835774en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/31154/1/0000052.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1994.1306en_US
dc.identifier.sourceGynecologic Oncologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.