Show simple item record

Evaluation of North Carolina crash data reported to MCMIS Crash File

dc.contributor.authorMatteson, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlower, D.en_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Center for National Truck and Bus Statisticsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Transportation Safety Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Truck and Bus Safety Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-01-31T22:36:48Z
dc.date.available2006-01-31T22:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2005-05en_US
dc.identifierAccession Number: 98917en_US
dc.identifier.otherReport Number: UMTRI-2005-15en_US
dc.identifier.otherContract Number: DTMC75-02-R-00090en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/3138
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 28)en_US
dc.descriptionSpecial report, Task Den_US
dc.description.abstractThis document is part of a series of reports evaluating the data reported to the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) Crash file undertaken by the Center for National Truck and Bus Statistics at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Earlier studies showed that reporting to the MCMIS Crash file was significantly incomplete in other states. This report examines the sources of underreporting for the state of North Carolina. MCMIS Crash file records were matched to the North Carolina Police Accident Report (PAR) file to determine the nature and extent of reporting. Overall, North Carolina submitted 48.2% of its reportable crash involvements to the MCMIS Crash File in 2003. Reporting rates varied by vehicle type, crash severity, and reporting agency. Reporting rates are 63.3% for fatal crashes, 49.4% for injury cases, and 47.1% for tow/disabled accidents. Two-axle trucks are reported only 15.7% of the time, while tractor semitrailers and truck tractors each have reporting rates over 81%. Buses are only reported 9.9% of the time. Interstate vehicles were reported at a rate of 73.6%, compared with 40.3% for vehicles with instate license plates. The highway patrol reported 58.2% of cases they covered compared with 35.4% for the local police. Although North Carolina’s data collection system is comprehensive, it appears that issues connected with identifying the target vehicle as a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) is preventing all MCMIS-eligible vehicles from being identified. Officers are less likely to recognize smaller vehicles and those operating in state as CMVs, and thus do not record the CMV variables for these cases. Evidence suggests that failure to fill out the CMV section of the PAR form results in such cases not being submitted to the MCMIS Crash file.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.formatill., chartsen_US
dc.format.extent1943 bytes
dc.format.extent794724 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMCMIS Crash Fileen_US
dc.subject.otherMotor Carriersen_US
dc.subject.otherTrucksen_US
dc.subject.otherBusesen_US
dc.subject.otherEvaluative Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherDatabases/ Data Banksen_US
dc.subject.otherData Acquisition Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Statistics/ Accident Ratesen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Recordsen_US
dc.subject.otherPolice Reportsen_US
dc.subject.otherState Governments/ Province Governmentsen_US
dc.subject.otherNorth Carolinaen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of North Carolina crash data reported to MCMIS Crash Fileen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of North Carolina crash data reported to Motor Carrier Management Information System Crash Fileen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/3138/2/98917.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.