A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States
dc.contributor.author | Aldridge, Kenneth E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gelfand, Michael | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barth Reller, L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ayers, Leona W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pierson, Carl L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schoenknecht, Fritz | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tilton, Richard C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wilkins, Jeanette | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Henderberg, Amy | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schiro, Denise D. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T18:14:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T18:14:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Aldridge, Kenneth E., Gelfand, Michael, Barth Reller, L., Ayers, Leona W., Pierson, Carl L., Schoenknecht, Fritz, Tilton, Richard C., Wilkins, Jeanette, Henderberg, Amy, Schiro, Denise D. (1994/04)."A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States." Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 18(4): 235-241. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31666> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T60-476TVR0-4F/2/ce0988d8892eabf30aedec6081749051 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31666 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7924220&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Over 2800 clinical strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were collected during a 5-year period from ten geographically separate sites and tested for their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents using a broth microdilution method. Among the cephalosporins, ceftizoxime was the most active (13% resistance) and importantly exhibited relatively equal activity against both B. fragilis species and non-B. fragilis species. Cefotaxime exhibited similar activity with an overall resistance rate of 18%. Both ceftriaxone and cefoperazone were appreciably less active cephalosporins especially against non-B. fragilis species. With regard to cephamycins, cefoxitin (MIC90, 32 [mu]g/ml) was more active than cefotetan (MIC90, [ges]256 [mu]g/ml) and cefmetazole (MIC90, 64 [mu]g/ml). Non-B. fragilis species were highly resistant to cefotetan and cefmetazole. Imipenem was highly active against all strains with the exception of four strains of B. fragilis. Ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam were all highly active with resistance rates <2%. No resistance was detected to metronidazole, whereas 14% of isolates were resistant to clindamycin. When compared with other studies, these findings underscore the wide variability in susceptibility patterns reported nationwide and the need to continue monitoring these patterns to aid in choosing the most active compounds for therapy. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 619940 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Biological Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | From the Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The Methodist Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The University of the Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The Los Angeles Country-USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | From the Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | From the Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana, USA | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 7924220 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/31666/1/0000601.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(94)90026-4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.