Show simple item record

A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States

dc.contributor.authorAldridge, Kenneth E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGelfand, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarth Reller, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Leona W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPierson, Carl L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoenknecht, Fritzen_US
dc.contributor.authorTilton, Richard C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Jeanetteen_US
dc.contributor.authorHenderberg, Amyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchiro, Denise D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T18:14:41Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T18:14:41Z
dc.date.issued1994-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationAldridge, Kenneth E., Gelfand, Michael, Barth Reller, L., Ayers, Leona W., Pierson, Carl L., Schoenknecht, Fritz, Tilton, Richard C., Wilkins, Jeanette, Henderberg, Amy, Schiro, Denise D. (1994/04)."A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States." Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 18(4): 235-241. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31666>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T60-476TVR0-4F/2/ce0988d8892eabf30aedec6081749051en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31666
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7924220&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractOver 2800 clinical strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were collected during a 5-year period from ten geographically separate sites and tested for their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents using a broth microdilution method. Among the cephalosporins, ceftizoxime was the most active (13% resistance) and importantly exhibited relatively equal activity against both B. fragilis species and non-B. fragilis species. Cefotaxime exhibited similar activity with an overall resistance rate of 18%. Both ceftriaxone and cefoperazone were appreciably less active cephalosporins especially against non-B. fragilis species. With regard to cephamycins, cefoxitin (MIC90, 32 [mu]g/ml) was more active than cefotetan (MIC90, [ges]256 [mu]g/ml) and cefmetazole (MIC90, 64 [mu]g/ml). Non-B. fragilis species were highly resistant to cefotetan and cefmetazole. Imipenem was highly active against all strains with the exception of four strains of B. fragilis. Ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam were all highly active with resistance rates &lt;2%. No resistance was detected to metronidazole, whereas 14% of isolates were resistant to clindamycin. When compared with other studies, these findings underscore the wide variability in susceptibility patterns reported nationwide and the need to continue monitoring these patterns to aid in choosing the most active compounds for therapy.en_US
dc.format.extent619940 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleA five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFrom the Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Methodist Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of the Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Los Angeles Country-USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFrom the Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFrom the Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Lousiana, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid7924220en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/31666/1/0000601.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(94)90026-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseaseen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.