Show simple item record

Cell-Specific Kinetics and Efficiency of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Entry Are Determined by Two Distinct Phases of Attachment

dc.contributor.authorMcClain, Deborah S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Almyra Ovetaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T18:23:12Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T18:23:12Z
dc.date.issued1994-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcClain, Deborah S., Fuller, A. Oveta (1994/02/01)."Cell-Specific Kinetics and Efficiency of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Entry Are Determined by Two Distinct Phases of Attachment." Virology 198(2): 690-702. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31822>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WXR-45NSHR9-70/2/14903448f34c30de10d4351614a9366aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/31822
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8291250&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractWe previously provided evidence for a model of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) entry by a cascade of interactions between components of the virion envelope and cellular plasma membrane (Fuller and Lee, 1992, J. Virol. 66, 5002-5012). In this report we have determined entry kinetics of wild-type HSV-1 into two highly susceptible cell lines to further explore the contributions of viral or cellular factors to entry. Penetration rates of preattached virus varied among several common laboratory HSV-1 strains into one cell line. However, entry kinetics varied substantially for a single strain into highly susceptible HEp-2 or Vero cells under identical conditions. Plaquing efficiencies and sensitivity to heparin also significantly differed between these cells. Kinetics of entry that included virus attachment and penetration showed that the cell-specific effects can be explained by two distinct phases of attachment that occurred before penetration, but differed in duration on both susceptible cell lines. Initial attachment of virus is resistant to removal with phosphate-buffered saline, but sensitive to removal with buffer containing heparin. This is followed by a second type of attachment that is heparin resistant, but still sensitive to extracellular inactivation. We conclude that although undefined factors unique to individual wild-type HSV-1 laboratory strains affect entry kinetics, entry of any one strain is greatly influenced by interactions of virus with specific cell components during at least two distinct phases of attachment before penetration. Moreover, the second phase to stabilize binding seems to be the rate-limiting event in entry. Since major differences in the amounts or sulfation patterns of heparan sulfate were not detected, differences in the surfaces of HEp-2 and Vero cells that influence the kinetics and efficiency of HSV-1 entry are likely in the fine structure of heparan sulfate or in the presence and quantity of other unidentified receptors.en_US
dc.format.extent787683 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleCell-Specific Kinetics and Efficiency of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Entry Are Determined by Two Distinct Phases of Attachmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid8291250en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/31822/1/0000768.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1006/viro.1994.1081en_US
dc.identifier.sourceVirologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.