Show simple item record

Glutamine synthetase : VI. Mechanism of the dithiol-dependent inhibition by arsenite

dc.contributor.authorWu, Chungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-13T14:44:37Z
dc.date.available2006-04-13T14:44:37Z
dc.date.issued1965-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationWu, Chung (1965/01)."Glutamine synthetase : VI. Mechanism of the dithiol-dependent inhibition by arsenite." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis 96(1): 134-147. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32065>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B73G8-48BD9MC-J/2/869d2e34add0f9dc5aeaebd1ef4db926en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32065
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14285255&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractDithiol-dependent inhibition by arsenite has been demonstrated in glutamine synthetase (-glutamate: ammonia ligase (ADP), EC 6.3.1.2) obtained from various sources: from Neurospora to mammalian tissues. With a partially purified enzyme preparation from rat liver, [alpha],[omega]-dimercaptoalkanes, heterocyclic and aromatic dimercapto compounds have been compared for their ability to activate the enzyme and to mediate arsenite inhibition. BAL and 1,2-dimercaptoethane proved to be the most effective dithiols in both respects.Equimolar quantities of BAL and arsenite produced the greatest inhibition of glutamine synthetase. Excess arsenite did not cause an additional inhibition, but excess BAL diminished it. Cysteine, though less effective than BAL, also reversed the inhibition.Mapharside inhibited the enzyme at low concentrations and required no dithiol. Inhibition by either mapharside or p-arsenosobenzoate could be prevented more effectively by BAL than by cysteine. Inhibition by the organic arsenicals increased progressively with the length of time of prior incubation with the enzyme; that by arsenite, however, showed little increase. In contrast, prior incubation with o-iodosobenzoate produced a spontaneous reactivation of the enzyme with time.Both Cd2+ and mercurial treatments of glutamine synthetase altered the course of arsenite inhibition. Cd2+ treatment appeared to interfere with arsenite inhibition; mercurial treatment enabled cysteine, as well as BAL to mediate the inhibition.Evidence has been presented to show that the enzyme-arsenite complex dissociates readily. Moreover, kinetic analysis gives a value for K1 as high as Km for hydroxylamine and adenosinetriphosphate. These results have invalidated the currently held assumption that dithiol-dependent arsenite inhibition results in the formation of a relatively stable ring structure with two closely juxtaposed sulfhydryl groups of the enzyme molecule. Instead, a mechanism has been proposed for the dithiol-mediated inhibition by arsenite, which entails reaction with only one sulfhydryl group of glutamine synthetase.en_US
dc.format.extent1465332 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleGlutamine synthetase : VI. Mechanism of the dithiol-dependent inhibition by arseniteen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid14285255en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/32065/1/0000109.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2787(65)90617-9en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiochimica et Biophysica Actaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.