Show simple item record

Pharmacological patterns in subcortical reinforcement behavior

dc.contributor.authorOlds, Marianne E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOlds, James L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-13T14:49:32Z
dc.date.available2006-04-13T14:49:32Z
dc.date.issued1963-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationOlds, M. E., Olds, J. (1963/12)."Pharmacological patterns in subcortical reinforcement behavior." Neuropharmacology 2(6): 309-325. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32179>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0C-475BCM7-7/2/7e9d1cda82814cf454a2fad574137bb6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32179
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14119492&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBy means of intercurrent hypothalamic positive reinforcement and tegmental negative reinforcement tests, drug actions on two different brain-stimulated behaviors were assessed simultaneously. Chlorpromazine at 2 mg/kg was effective in antagonizing both hypothalamic positive reinforcement behavior; however, it did produce sustained reduction of tegmental negative but it regularly caused a greater percentage deficit in hypothalamic positive behavior. Meprobamate at 100 mg/kg did not regularly produce lasting reduction of hypothalamic positive reinforcement behavior; however, it did produce sustained reduction of tegmental negative reinforcement behavior. In the case of meprobamate, therefore, there was regularly a greater percentage deficit in tegmental negative behavior. While the imbalanced action of chlorpromazine against positive reinforcement may be explained by aspects of the testing procedure (such as the widely different speeds of the two behaviors) and have no relation to the difference in emotional sign, the opposite imbalanced action of meprobamate makes it quite clear that the two chemicals have quite different modes of action in relation to these brain and behavior tests. The findings with LSD and amphetamine were less informative; LSD had regularly a brief suppressing effect on hypothalamic behavior; amphetamine augmented the slow tegmental negative behavior but often slowed the rapid hypothalamic positive behavior.en_US
dc.format.extent214584 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titlePharmacological patterns in subcortical reinforcement behavioren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid14119492en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/32179/1/0000235.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(63)90007-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeuropharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.