Show simple item record

A comparison of the pharmacology of two potent analgesic agents, piminodine (Win 14,098-2) and Win 13,797, with morphine and meperidine

dc.contributor.authorWoods, L. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeneau, Gerald A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Donald R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDomino, Edward F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSeevers, Maurice H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-13T14:57:47Z
dc.date.available2006-04-13T14:57:47Z
dc.date.issued1961-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationWoods, L. A., Deneau, G. A., Bennett, D. R., Domino, E. F., Seevers, M. H. (1961/05)."A comparison of the pharmacology of two potent analgesic agents, piminodine (Win 14,098-2) and Win 13,797, with morphine and meperidine,." Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 3(3): 358-379. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32367>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WXH-4DDNW43-K8/2/a0da15450f972ce24f88f2825dfb4063en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32367
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=13786579&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe toxic and lethal effects of piminodine and Win 13,797 were studied in mice, dogs, and monkeys. The analgesic actions of both drugs were tested in mice and rats and were found to be more potent than morphine.Vascular studies on pimincdine and Win 13,797 have shown peripheral vasodilation and acute vascular tolerance to the hypotensive effect in dogs with partial crossed tolerance to morphine. Dogs anesthetized with pentobarbital were sensitive to the respiratory depressant actions of these drugs. Nalorphine readily antagonizes this respiratory depression.Piminodine and Win 13,797 are myocardial depressants on the dog heart-lung preparation and the cat papillary muscle, but only in doses or concentrations much higher than would be used therapeutically.The actions of piminodine and Win 13,797 on the isolated rabbit jejunal segment are minimal.The qualitative actions of piminodine and Win 13,797 on EEG effects in dogs with chronically implanted electrodes were like those of morphine. Quantitatively, Win 13,797 was equipotent to morphine, and piminodine one-half as effective.Studies on single-dose suppression in monkey and primary physical dependence in dogs and monkeys indicate that piminodine and Win 13,797 have high addiction liability at least in these species.Nearly all the administered piminodine or Win 13,797 is altered chemically when injected into dogs. There is no evidence for marked local tissue deposition for either drug.en_US
dc.format.extent1210079 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleA comparison of the pharmacology of two potent analgesic agents, piminodine (Win 14,098-2) and Win 13,797, with morphine and meperidineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid13786579en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/32367/1/0000442.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(61)90072-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceToxicology and Applied Pharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.