Show simple item record

Evaluation of New Jersey crash data reported to MCMIS crash file

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Paul E.en
dc.contributor.authorBlower, D.en_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Center for National Truck Statisticsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Transportation Safety Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Truck and Bus Safety Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-13T20:07:18Z
dc.date.available2006-04-13T20:07:18Z
dc.date.issued2005-02
dc.identifierAccession Number: 98820en
dc.identifier.otherReport Number: UMTRI-2005-13en
dc.identifier.otherGrant Number: DTMC75-02-R-00090en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/32637
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 26)en
dc.descriptionSpecial report, Task Den
dc.description.abstractThis report is part of a series evaluating the data submitted to the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) Crash File undertaken by the Center for National Truck and Bus Statistics at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Earlier studies showed that reporting to the MCMIS Crash File was significantly incomplete. This report examines reporting from the state of New Jersey. New Jersey Police Accident Report (PAR) files were matched to the MCMIS Crash file to determine the nature and extent of underreporting. In 2003, there were 10,103 crash involvements in New Jersey that were reportable to the MCMIS Crash file. Of these crash involvements, 8,333 were actually reported, resulting in a reporting rate of 82.5%. In addition, 5.3% of MCMIS cases that were reported do not qualify for reporting. Reporting rates vary by crash severity, crash month, and jurisdiction. Unlike many other states in which reporting rates were greater for more severe involvements, in New Jersey reporting rates were lower for more severe involvements. The reporting rates were 67.4% for fatal involvements, 81.5% for injury involvements, and 83.2% for towaway involvements. Underreporting is also related to the time of the year, indicating delays in providing the data. The month of December had the highest percent of unreported cases (21.7%). Data quality is also reviewed. The PAR case number contains inconsistent characters such as dashes, question marks, and asterisks. This appears to be a source of duplicate records. The ambulance run number and the hazardous materials placard variables also contain many inconsistent characters.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.en
dc.formatill., chartsen
dc.format.extent34en
dc.format.extent2477421 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMCMIS Crash Fileen
dc.subject.otherMotor Carriersen
dc.subject.otherTrucksen
dc.subject.otherBusesen
dc.subject.otherEvaluative Methodsen
dc.subject.otherDatabases/ Data Banksen
dc.subject.otherData Acquisition Methodsen
dc.subject.otherAccident Statistics/ Accident Ratesen
dc.subject.otherAccident Recordsen
dc.subject.otherPolice Reportsen
dc.subject.otherState Governments/ Province Governmentsen
dc.subject.otherNew Jerseyen
dc.titleEvaluation of New Jersey crash data reported to MCMIS crash fileen
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of New Jersey crash data reported to Motor Carrier Management Information System crash fileen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/32637/1/98820.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.