Show simple item record

Differential actions of m and n cholinergic agonists on the brainstem activating system

dc.contributor.authorHiroshi Kawamura,en_US
dc.contributor.authorDomino, Edward F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-17T15:21:44Z
dc.date.available2006-04-17T15:21:44Z
dc.date.issued1969-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationHiroshi Kawamura, , Domino, Edward F. (1969/03)."Differential actions of m and n cholinergic agonists on the brainstem activating system." Neuropharmacology 8(2): 105-115. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/33004>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0C-478NM10-VB/2/ac73642b957f865e6012c9280d3f253ben_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/33004
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=5814585&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe differential actions of i.v. arecoline and nicotine were determined on neocortical and limbic system EEG activation in acute rostral and caudal midbrain transected cats. All animals were prepared under diethyl ether anesthesia and after surgery, paralyzed with decamethonium and maintained on artificial respiration. The peripheral effects of these cholinergic agonists were reduced by methyl atropine (250 [mu]g/kg ) and/or trimethidinium (1 mg/kg) pretreatment.In the caudal midbrain transected preparation, nicotine (20-40 [mu]g/kg) induced marked EEG activation in both the neocortex and hippocampus. After bilateral lesions of the midbrain reticular formation in the same preparation, EEG activation was not observed with nicotine in doses up to 100 [mu]g/kg. The EEG effects of nicotine were blocked by atropine (1 mg/kg) and mecamylamine (1 mg/kg) but not trimethidinium (1 mg/kg). In the rostral midbrain transected preparation no EEG activation was noted with nicotine in doses up to 100 [mu]g/kg. Sporadic sharp waves appeared in the hippocampus with the larger doses indicating a convulsant site of action above the level of transection.Arecoline induced dissociation of the EEG in the hippocampus and neocortex in doses of 20-40 [mu]g/kg in the rostral midbrain transected cat. Marked hippocampal slow "arousal" waves with no desynchronization of the neocortical EEG were seen. These effects of arecoline were blocked by atropine. In the caudal midbrain preparation, even after bilateral lesions of the midbrain reticular formation which blocked nicotine activation, arecoline (20-40 [mu]g/kg) still induced hippocampal slow `arousal' waves without neocortical desynchronization. With doses of 100 [mu]g/kg of arecoline both neocortical and hippocampal EEG activation was noted.It is concluded that the site of nicotine on the rostral forebrain activating system is located primarily in the midbrain reticular formation, whereas arecoline acts on the midbrain reticular formation as well as above the level of the mesencephalon.en_US
dc.format.extent999375 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDifferential actions of m and n cholinergic agonists on the brainstem activating systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA; Lafayette Clinic, Detroit, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA; Lafayette Clinic, Detroit, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid5814585en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/33004/1/0000388.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(69)90004-5en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeuropharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.