Show simple item record

The calibration of a Ge(Li) gamma-ray spectrometer for energy and relative intensity measurements

dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Denis P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaer, Helmut W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReidy, J. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWiedenbeck, M. L. (Marcellus Lee)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-17T16:13:48Z
dc.date.available2006-04-17T16:13:48Z
dc.date.issued1967en_US
dc.identifier.citationDonnelly, D. P., Baer, H. W., Reidy, J. J., Wiedenbeck, M. L. (1967)."The calibration of a Ge(Li) gamma-ray spectrometer for energy and relative intensity measurements." Nuclear Instruments and Methods 57(): 219-226. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/33388>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B73DN-471XCWG-BJ/2/64f4d1c89a0f60df61e92041bb22ff9fen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/33388
dc.description.abstractTwo aspects of Ge(Li) gamma-ray spectrometry are discussed. The non-linearity of an amplifier-analyzer system was measured using a precision pulser and was checked with gamma-ray standards. The overall accuracy was 2 parts in 104. The relative detection efficiency of gamma-ray full-energy peaks was determined using sources with well measured relative gamma-ray emission rates. Two Ge(Li) detectors with active volumes of 3 cm2 x 0.5 cm and 4 cm2 x 0.5 cm were calibrated in the energy range 80--3200 keV. An overall accuracy of 5% in the energy region from 500-3200 keV and an accuracy of 10% over the entire range was obtained. The relative areas of the single escape peak and double escape peak to the full energy peak as a function of energy are included. The relative intensities of the 569.6, 1063.6 and 1771 keV gamma-rays following the decay of 207Bi were measured.en_US
dc.format.extent520282 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleThe calibration of a Ge(Li) gamma-ray spectrometer for energy and relative intensity measurementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/33388/1/0000787.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(67)90528-9en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNuclear Instruments and Methodsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.