Opposite medical thalamic unit responses to rewarding and aversive brain stimulation
dc.contributor.author | Keene, James J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-17T16:40:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-17T16:40:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1973-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Keene, James J. (1973/04)."Opposite medical thalamic unit responses to rewarding and aversive brain stimulation." Experimental Neurology 39(1): 19-35. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/33900> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WFG-4BJW0HS-R7/2/0367a5463d1f49aea3d68d9e8c9545fd | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/33900 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=4698585&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Medial thalamus receives fibers from both medial forebrain bundle (MFB) and hindbrain and midbrain reticular formation (RET). The MFB and RET stimulations are rewarding and aversive respectively. In 32 unanesthetized cerveau isole rats, 158 units were recorded. The MFB and RET effects converge on two thirds of the units recorded in the dorsal medial and paracentral nuclei of thalamus and are opposite in the following ways: post-stimulus pattern of unit discharge during 7 Hz stimulation; slow-wave recruiting with MFB, but not RET, 7 Hz stimulation; and at a "desynchronization" stimulus frequency (20 Hz), MFB elicits decreased unit discharge and RET elicits increased unit discharge, compared to the 7 Hz rates. In the intralaminar and parafasicular nuclei, post-train (60 Hz, 0.2 sec) decreases and increases in unit firing lasting seconds are often elicited with MFB and RET trains respectively. Stimulation of hypothalamic sites outside MFB did not elicit these MFB effects; parafasicular stimulation did not elicit the RET effects. The MFB effects were not seen in habenula or ventral basal thalamus. Hippocampal, habenular, and ventral medial thalamic units did not show opposite MFB and RET effects. Threshold currents for the opposite MFB and RET effects are similar to those eliciting self-stimulation and escape respectively in several operated rats tested both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1005624 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Opposite medical thalamic unit responses to rewarding and aversive brain stimulation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 4698585 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/33900/1/0000165.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(73)90038-1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Experimental Neurology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.