Show simple item record

Methodological studies of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the US national comorbidity survey (NCS)

dc.contributor.authorKessler, Ronald C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWittchen, Hans-Ulrichen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbelson, Jamie M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGonagle, Katherine A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Norberten_US
dc.contributor.authorKendler, Kenneth S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKnäuper, Bärbelen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Shanyangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-18T20:52:22Z
dc.date.available2006-04-18T20:52:22Z
dc.date.issued1998-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationKessler, Ronald C.; Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich; Abelson, Jamie M.; Mcgonagle, Katherine; Schwarz, Norbert; Kendler, Kenneth S.; KnÄuper, BÄrbel; Zhao, Shanyang (1998)."Methodological studies of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the US national comorbidity survey (NCS)." International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 7(1): 33-55. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34217>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-8931en_US
dc.identifier.issn1234-988Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34217
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the results of methodological studies carried out in conjunction with the US National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) to evaluate Version 1.0 of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). These studies relied on recent survey data collection methodology literature to investigate problems regarding question comprehension, instruction comprehension, respondent motivation to report accurately, and regarding the limits of respondent ability to report accurately. Insights and strategies developed by survey methodologists were used to modify the CIDI in an effort to address these problems. The paper describes these strategies and methodological studies that evaluated their effects, including a clinical reappraisal study and a field experiment that evaluated the impact of question modifications on prevalence estimates. The paper closes with a discussion of remaining methodological problems with the CIDI and potentially useful future studies that might be able to develop solutions to these problems. Copyright © 1998 Whurr Publishers Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent549239 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.titleMethodological studies of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the US national comorbidity survey (NCS)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA ; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02160.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Genetics, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Sociology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34217/1/33_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.33en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.