Show simple item record

Methodological innovations in the National Survey of American Life

dc.contributor.authorJackson, James S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNeighbors, Harold W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNesse, Randolph M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTrierweiler, Steven J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Myriamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-18T20:52:51Z
dc.date.available2006-04-18T20:52:51Z
dc.date.issued2004-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationJackson, James S.; Neighbors, Harold W.; Nesse, Randolph M.; Trierweiler, Steven J.; Torres, Myriam (2004)."Methodological innovations in the National Survey of American Life." International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 13(4): 289-298. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34227>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-8931en_US
dc.identifier.issn1234-988Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34227
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15719533&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an overview of the conceptualization and methods used in the National Survey of American Life (NSAL). The objectives of the NSAL are to investigate the nature, severity, and impairment of mental disorders among national samples of the black and non-Hispanic white (n = 1,006) populations in the US, including African American (N = 3,570), and Afro-Caribbean (N = 1,623) immigrant and second and older generation, populations. National multi-stage probability methods were used in generating the samples and race/ethnic matching of interviewers and respondents were employed in the largely face-to-face interview, lasting on average 2 hours and 20 minutes. Two methodological approaches are described for addressing sampling coverage of individuals attached to, but not residing in, selected households at the time of the study. The paper also describes two approaches used to address concerns about the interpretations of standard symptom probe information in assessing serious mental disorders. This included a clinical reappraisal study designed to ascertain differences in symptom responding and ascertainment of cases (N = 677) in a subset of the same NSAL respondents. Finally, an abbreviated, novel method for estimating the prevalence of mental disorders in first-degree family members is described and the preliminary results from this new approach are reported. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent139821 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.titleMethodological innovations in the National Survey of American Lifeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumResearch Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan, USA ; Room 5010 Institute for Social Research, 426 Thompson Street, PO Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumProgram for Research on Black Americans, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumResearch Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumResearch Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumResearch Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15719533en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34227/1/182_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.182en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.