Show simple item record

Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain

dc.contributor.authorGiesecke, Thorstenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGracely, Richard H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Masilo A. B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNachemson, Alfen_US
dc.contributor.authorPetzke, Frank W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClauw, Daniel J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:27:51Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:27:51Z
dc.date.issued2004-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationGiesecke, Thorsten; Gracely, Richard H.; Grant, Masilo A. B.; Nachemson, Alf; Petzke, Frank; Williams, David A.; Clauw, Daniel J. (2004)."Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain." Arthritis & Rheumatism 50(2): 613-623. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34310>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-3591en_US
dc.identifier.issn1529-0131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34310
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14872506&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective For many individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there is no identifiable cause. In other idiopathic chronic pain conditions, sensory testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have identified the occurrence of generalized increased pain sensitivity, hyperalgesia, and altered brain processing, suggesting central augmentation of pain processing in such conditions. We compared the results of both of these methods as applied to patients with idiopathic CLBP (n = 11), patients with widespread pain (fibromyalgia; n = 16), and healthy control subjects (n = 11). Methods Patients with CLBP had low back pain persisting for at least 12 months that was unexplained by MRI/radiographic changes. Experimental pain testing was performed at a neutral site (thumbnail) to assess the pressure-pain threshold in all subjects. For fMRI studies, stimuli of equal pressure (2 kg) and of equal subjective pain intensity (slightly intense pain) were applied to this same site. Results Despite low numbers of tender points in the CLBP group, experimental pain testing revealed hyperalgesia in this group as well as in the fibromyalgia group; the pressure required to produce slightly intense pain was significantly higher in the controls (5.6 kg) than in the patients with CLBP (3.9 kg) ( P = 0.03) or the patients with fibromyalgia (3.5 kg) ( P = 0.006). When equal amounts of pressure were applied to the 3 groups, fMRI detected 5 common regions of neuronal activation in pain-related cortical areas in the CLBP and fibromyalgia groups (in the contralateral primary and secondary [S2] somatosensory cortices, inferior parietal lobule, cerebellum, and ipsilateral S2). This same stimulus resulted in only a single activation in controls (in the contralateral S2 somatosensory cortex). When subjects in the 3 groups received stimuli that evoked subjectively equal pain, fMRI revealed common neuronal activations in all 3 groups. Conclusion At equal levels of pressure, patients with CLBP or fibromyalgia experienced significantly more pain and showed more extensive, common patterns of neuronal activation in pain-related cortical areas. When stimuli that elicited equally painful responses were applied (requiring significantly lower pressure in both patient groups as compared with the control group), neuronal activations were similar among the 3 groups. These findings are consistent with the occurrence of augmented central pain processing in patients with idiopathic CLBP.en_US
dc.format.extent251701 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.titleEvidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor ; University of Michigan, Chronic Pain & Fatigue Research Program, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, PO Box 385, Ann Arbor, MI 48106en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, and University of GÖteborg, GÖteborg, Swedenen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Cologne, Cologne, Germanyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid14872506en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34310/1/20063_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.20063en_US
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis & Rheumatismen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.