Show simple item record

Cancer of the corpus uteri in white and black women in Michigan, 1985-1994

dc.contributor.authorMadison, Terrien_US
dc.contributor.authorSchottenfeld, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Vickien_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:30:15Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:30:15Z
dc.date.issued1998-10-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationMadison, Terri; Schottenfeld, David; Baker, Vicki (1998)."Cancer of the corpus uteri in white and black women in Michigan, 1985-1994." Cancer 83(8): 1546-1554. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34349>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34349
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9781948&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Cancer of the corpus uteri occurs more commonly among white women in the U.S., yet survival is poorer for black women. This study examined whether this trend has changed and also examined the relation of age and histologic subtype to differences in stage. METHODS This retrospective cohort study assessed incidence trends, mortality trends, and the relation of age and histologic subtype to stage for 12,079 incident cases and 2325 deaths registered between 1985 and 1994 in Michigan. Rate ratios compared incidence and mortality. Odds ratios quantified the contribution of age and histologic subtype to differences in risk for advanced stage, using Mantel-Haenszel univariate techniques and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS The overall incidence rate was 21.99 per 100,000, and the overall mortality rate was 3.82 per 100,000. Black women had a 40% lower risk (rate ratio [RR] = 0.60) of developing cancer of the corpus uteri but had a 54% greater risk (RR = 1.54) of dying from cancer of the corpus uteri. Black women were at greater risk of being diagnosed with either sarcoma or more aggressive adenocarcinoma. However, after adjustment for age and histologic subtype, black women still had an increased risk for advanced stage disease (2.63, 95% confidence interval = 2.19-3.16). CONCLUSIONS The disparity between white and black women persists in incidence and mortality trends for cancer of the corpus uteri. The greater frequency of more aggressive histologic subtypes experienced by black women accounts for only 10% of their excess risk for more advanced stage disease. Cancer 1998;83:1546-1554. © 1998 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent120884 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleCancer of the corpus uteri in white and black women in Michigan, 1985-1994en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 109 Observatory Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid9781948en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34349/1/9_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981015)83:8<1546::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-Men_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.