Show simple item record

An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography

dc.contributor.authorChen, Steven L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Samuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorPierce, Lori J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Daniel F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHelvie, Mark A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGreeno, Paula L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Lisa A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Alfred E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:32:05Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:32:05Z
dc.date.issued2004-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationChen, Steven L.; Clark, Samuel; Pierce, Lori J.; Hayes, Daniel F.; Helvie, Mark A.; Greeno, Paula L.; Newman, Lisa A.; Chang, Alfred E. (2004)."An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography." Cancer 101(5): 1043-1050. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34389>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34389
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15329914&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND The current study sought to determine the institutional financial impact of a screening mammography (SM) program in the context of an integrated cancer center. METHODS Using administrative databases, 10,048 women were identified as receiving screening mammograms in fiscal year 1999 and the first one-half of fiscal year 2000. The utilization of breast care resources was followed for an average of 1208 days. The University of Michigan cost accounting system was then used to determine overall margin (revenues − total costs) and contribution margin (revenues − actual costs) of the SM program, as well as other breast care services. RESULTS The percentage of variable costs to total costs for the SM program was 24%. The overall facility losses in the breast care line were $1.7 million with a positive contribution margin of $2.0 million. The annual yield of nonscreening/diagnostic mammographic procedures was 0.9%. All types of radiologic activity failed to cover their total costs, but did provide a positive contribution margin. Overall margins for surgery procedures were approximately even, and adjuvant medical and radiotherapy services were net positive. Modeling helped to identify overhead limits necessary to achieve margin targets associated with increased activity. CONCLUSIONS The current study showed that SM programs are unlikely to succeed financially without careful selection of those screened to increase the yield of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Based on favorable contribution margins, SM programs were viable when viewed as incremental business. Cancer 2004. © 2004 by the American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent183331 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleAn academic health center cost analysis of screening mammographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Center for Health Care Economics, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPrograms and Operations Analysis, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumOffice of the Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 647-9647 ; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 3302 Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0932en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15329914en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34389/1/20476_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20476en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.