Show simple item record

Racial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992–1999

dc.contributor.authorUnderwood, Willieen_US
dc.contributor.authorJackson, James S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWei, John T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Rodney L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Edmonden_US
dc.contributor.authorDeMonner, Sonya M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWood, David P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:32:13Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2005-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationUnderwood, Willie; Jackson, James; Wei, John T.; Dunn, Rodney; Baker, Edmond; DeMonner, Sonya; Wood, David P. (2005)."Racial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992–1999." Cancer 103(3): 538-545. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34392>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34392
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15612083&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND African-American men have a greater incidence of and mortality from prostate carcinoma compared with white men, and they are less likely to receive definitive therapy (radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy). During the 1990s, the use of brachytherapy increased; however, its influence on racial and ethnic prostate carcinoma treatment trends remains unclear. The objective of this study was to describe treatment trends over the period 1992–1999 for localized/regional prostate carcinoma among white, Hispanic, and African-American men. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data from 1992 through 1999, logistic regression models were used to determine whether the odds of receiving a specific treatment modality differed by racial and ethnic group and whether the differences changed over time when the models were adjusted for age, marital status, tumor grade, and SEER site (geography). RESULTS The authors identified 142,340 men, including white men (81.6%), Hispanic men (6.4%), and African-American men (12.0%). Racial and ethnic differences in the rates of use of androgen-deprivation therapy/expectant management were noted; however, these differences appeared to lessen over time ( P < 0.001). The rate of utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for Hispanic men, remained flat for African-American men, and decreased for white men. The utilization of brachytherapy and combination therapy increased for all three groups; however, the greatest increase in utilization was among white men. CONCLUSIONS Further research will be required to determine the patient-level and provider-level variables that influence racial and ethnic treatment differences in localized/regional prostate cancer. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent216904 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleRacial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992–1999en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Clinical Research and Quality Assurance, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Veterans Administration Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 647-3301 ; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumResearch Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Center for African American and African Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Clinical Research and Quality Assurance, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Clinical Research and Quality Assurance, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRobert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Clinical Research and Quality Assurance, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15612083en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34392/1/20796_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20796en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.