Show simple item record

Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? * Any opinions, findings, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

dc.contributor.authorSonger, Nancy Butleren_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hee-Sunen_US
dc.contributor.authorKam, Rosalinden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:37:57Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:37:57Z
dc.date.issued2002-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationSonger, Nancy Butler; Lee, Hee-Sun; Kam, Rosalind (2002)."Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? * Any opinions, findings, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(2): 128-150. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34516>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4308en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2736en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34516
dc.description.abstractWhat are the barriers to technology-rich inquiry pedagogy in urban science classrooms, and what kinds of programs and support structures allow these barriers to be overcome? Research on the pedagogical practices within urban classrooms suggests that as a result of many constraints, many urban teachers' practices emphasize directive, controlling teaching, that is, the “pedagogy of poverty” (Haberman, 1991 ), rather than the facilitation of students' ownership and control over their learning, as advocated in inquiry science. On balance, research programs that advocate standards-based or inquiry teaching pedagogies demonstrate strong learning outcomes by urban students. This study tracked classroom research on a technology-rich inquiry weather program with six urban science teachers. The teachers implemented this program in coordination with a district-wide middle school science reform. Results indicated that despite many challenges in the first year of implementation, students in all 19 classrooms of this program demonstrated significant content and inquiry gains. In addition, case study data comprised of twice-weekly classroom observations and interviews with the six teachers suggest support structures that were both conducive and challenging to inquiry pedagogy. Our work has extended previous studies on urban science pedagogy and practices as it has begun to articulate what role the technological component plays either in contributing to the challenges we experienced or in helping urban science classrooms to realize inquiry science and other positive learning values. Although these data outline results after only the first year of systemic reform, we suggest that they begin to build evidence for the role of technology-rich inquiry programs in combating the pedagogy of poverty in urban science classrooms. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 128-150, 2002en_US
dc.format.extent174661 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.titleTechnology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? * Any opinions, findings, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1259 ; University of Michigan, 1323 SEB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1259en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1259en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34516/1/10013_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10013en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teachingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.