Show simple item record

Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers' intentions

dc.contributor.authorZint, Michaelaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:37:59Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2002-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationZint, Michaela (2002)."Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers' intentions." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(9): 819-844. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34517>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4308en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2736en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34517
dc.description.abstractSocial psychologists' attitude-behavior theories can contribute to understanding science teachers' behaviors. Such understanding can, in turn, be used to improve professional development. This article describes leading attitude-behavior theories and summarizes results from past tests of these theories. A study predicting science teachers' intention to incorporate environmental risk education based on these theories is also reported. Data for that study were collected through a mail questionnaire ( n  = 1336, r adjusted  = 80%) and analyzed using confirmatory factor and multiple regression analysis. All determinants of intention to act in the Theory of Reasoned Action and Theory of Planned Behavior and some determinants in the Theory of Trying predicted science teachers' environmental risk education intentions. Given the consistency of results across studies, the Theory of Planned Behavior augmented with past behavior is concluded to provide the best attitude-behavior model for predicting science teachers' intention to act. Thus, science teachers' attitude toward the behavior, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norm need to be enhanced to modify their behavior. Based on the Theory of Trying, improving their attitude toward the process and toward success, and expectations of success may also result in changes. Future research should focus on identifying determinants that can further enhance the ability of these theories to predict and explain science teachers' behaviors. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 819–844, 2002en_US
dc.format.extent173990 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.titleComparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers' intentionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, Dana Building, 430 E. University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1115 ; School of Natural Resources and Environment, Dana Building, 430 E. University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1115.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34517/1/10047_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10047en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teachingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.