Show simple item record

Decomposition can harm the accuracy of behavioural frequency reports

dc.contributor.authorBelli, Robert F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Norberten_US
dc.contributor.authorSinger, Eleanoren_US
dc.contributor.authorTalarico, Jenniferen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T14:04:10Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T14:04:10Z
dc.date.issued2000-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBelli, Robert F.; Schwarz, Norbert; Singer, Eleanor; Talarico, Jennifer (2000)."Decomposition can harm the accuracy of behavioural frequency reports." Applied Cognitive Psychology 14(4): 295-308. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35010>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0888-4080en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-0720en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35010
dc.description.abstractIn survey research, the use of decomposition can lead to pronounced reporting errors as seen by overreporting and overall reporting error. A total of 87 subjects answered either decomposed or undecomposed questions concerning telephone calls made by them while at work. The questionnaire conditions varied the length of the reference period (1 week or 6 months), and the type of call (local or long-distance). Decomposition conditions introduced either spatial or temporal cues. In all comparisons, decomposed questions increased overreporting bias relative to undecomposed questions. In addition, undecomposed questions with a 1-week reference period led to increased overreporting bias in comparison to undecomposed/6-month questions. Results are consistent with a category split estimation model in which smaller categories are predicted to lead to overreporting, and larger categories to underreporting. Decomposition is not recommended for gaining retrospective reports of non-distinctive, frequent events. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent129423 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.titleDecomposition can harm the accuracy of behavioural frequency reportsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USA ; Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/35010/1/646_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<295::AID-ACP646>3.0.CO;2-1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceApplied Cognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.