Show simple item record

Affective states in job characteristics theory

dc.contributor.authorSaavedra, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorKwun, Seog K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T14:05:32Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T14:05:32Z
dc.date.issued2000-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationSaavedra, Richard; Kwun, Seog K. (2000)."Affective states in job characteristics theory." Journal of Organizational Behavior 21(2): 131-146. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35035>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-3796en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35035
dc.description.abstractThe potential consequences of affective experience at work prompt an examination of whether job characteristics are related to affect. Using two measurement models, we examined associations between perceptions of five job characteristics and self-reported mood. One model was based on traditional measures of ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ affect. The second model utilized a more differentiated measurement scheme consisting of four unipolar mood scores. Using both approaches achieves both broad and specific assessments of the links between affective states and job characteristics. Regression analyses of the survey data from 370 managers in 26 organizations indicated that job characteristics explained an average of 19 per cent of the variance in activated pleasant affect and an average of 11 per cent of the variance in activated unpleasant affect. Task significance and task autonomy were positively associated with activated pleasant affect. Skill variety was positively related, and task identity and task feedback were negatively correlated with activated unpleasant affect. Finally, Growth Need Strength (GNS) moderated the relation between the Motivating Potential Score (MPS) from the combined job characteristics and both activated pleasant and activated unpleasant affect. Using a four-factor model of affect (enthusiasm, fatigue, nervousness, and relaxation), we discuss preliminary implications for the design of work. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent156030 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.titleAffective states in job characteristics theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, The University of Michigan, 525 East University Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109, U.S.A. ; Department of Psychology, The University of Michigan, 525 East University Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Business Administration, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, 130-791 Koreaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/35035/1/39_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<131::AID-JOB39>3.0.CO;2-Qen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Organizational Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.