Show simple item record

Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations

dc.contributor.authorVogus, Timothy J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWelbourne, Theresa M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T14:05:42Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T14:05:42Z
dc.date.issued2003-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationVogus, Timothy J.; Welbourne, Theresa M. (2003)."Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations." Journal of Organizational Behavior 24(7): 877-903. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35038>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-3796en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35038
dc.description.abstractThis paper theoretically and empirically connects the literature on high-reliability organizations (HROs) to a broader set of organizations, which we call reliability-seeking organizations. Unlike HROs, which operate high-hazard technologies, reliability-seeking organizations operate in high-hazard environments. Reliability-seeking organizations are tightly coupled to their unpredictable and complex environments in such a manner that although the human mortality rate is low, the risk of small failures amplifying into organizational mortality is high. To cope with these environments, reliability-seeking organizations organize to remain open and flexible to emerging information and achieve the reliability demanded by their environments—intensity of innovation. These organizations utilize skilled temporary employees, positive employee relations, and an emphasis on training to innovate, and, in turn, generate greater financial performance. We test these hypotheses using a sample of 184 initial public offering (IPO) software firms that conducted their IPO between 1993 and 1996 and our results are consistent with our theorizing. Firms that utilized these human resource practices innovated more frequently and firms with more innovations had higher stock prices over time. Our findings combine to suggest a theoretical model of structural antecedents of a different type of reliability—intensity of innovation Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent217204 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.titleStructuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. ; The University of Michigan Business School, 701 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/35038/1/221_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.221en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Organizational Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.