Show simple item record

Is Ford 2000 the right strategy for innovation? A management theory perspective

dc.contributor.authorAfuah, Allanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T14:16:22Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T14:16:22Z
dc.date.issued1997-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationAfuah, Allan (1997)."Is Ford 2000 the right strategy for innovation? A management theory perspective." Strategic Change 6(6): 345-355. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35207>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1086-1718en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1697en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/35207
dc.description.abstract• In consolidating its North American and European product development into five Vehicle Program Centers (VPCs) to develop cars for all markets, integrating its manufacturing, supply, marketing and sales into a worldwide operation, Ford is moving from a so-called multi-domestic strategy to a global one. • The question is if this is the right strategy for an automobile company that wants to offer new low cost and/or differentiated products to its customers worldwide. • This article advances three points: • First, that although the strategic change is appropriate, it may not have gone far enough. • Second, to get the best out of the strategy, in any case, Ford must implement it well, moulding the right organizational structure, systems/processes, and the right people in the right positions. • Third, it must integrate into its systems, the right information and communications technologies. Optimal performance requires a fit between strategy, structure, systems/processes and people. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent191316 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherBusiness, Finance & Managementen_US
dc.titleIs Ford 2000 the right strategy for innovation? A management theory perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Business School, 701 Tappan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234, USA ; University of Michigan Business School, 701 Tappan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/35207/1/311_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1697(199710)6:6<345::AID-JSC311>3.0.CO;2-Pen_US
dc.identifier.sourceStrategic Changeen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.