Show simple item record

Comparative anatomy of the larynx in man and the chimpanzee: Implications for language in Neanderthal An earlier version of this paper was read at the April, 1973 meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists in Dallas, Texas.

dc.contributor.authorFalk, Deanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T15:54:29Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T15:54:29Z
dc.date.issued1975-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationFalk, Dean (1975)."Comparative anatomy of the larynx in man and the chimpanzee: Implications for language in Neanderthal An earlier version of this paper was read at the April, 1973 meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists in Dallas, Texas. ." American Journal of Physical Anthropology 43(1): 123-132. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/37553>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9483en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-8644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/37553
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1098478&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractUsing the larynges of the newborn human and chimpanzee as models, Lieberman and Crelin ('71) and Lieberman, Crelin and Klatt ('72) have reconstructed the larynx of the “classic” Neanderthal La Chapelle aux Saints. The authors used their reconstructed vocal tract to generate linguistic functions which led them to conclude that Neanderthal lacked the ability to produce fully articulate human speech. In this paper, it is shown that their reconstruction of the larynx of Neanderthal is based on a placement of the hyoid bone of La Chapelle which is too high. The reconstructed hyoid bone has been placed in a position unlike that occupied by hyoid bones of newborn humans, adult humans, stillborn chimpanzees or adult chimpanzees. In any laryngeal reconstruction, the function of swallowing must be taken into account. The ability of the reconstructed Neanderthal to swallow is discussed in light of a comparative analysis of swallowing in man and the chimpanzee. It is concluded that the statement that Neanderthal was less than fully articulate remains unsubstantiated because it rests on a questionable reconstruction of the larynx.en_US
dc.format.extent863968 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropologyen_US
dc.titleComparative anatomy of the larynx in man and the chimpanzee: Implications for language in Neanderthal An earlier version of this paper was read at the April, 1973 meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists in Dallas, Texas.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104en_US
dc.identifier.pmid1098478en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/37553/1/1330430116_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330430116en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.