Show simple item record

Detection of intraarticular abnormalities in osteoarthritis of the knee

dc.contributor.authorIke, Robert W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Rourke, Kenneth S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T16:24:57Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T16:24:57Z
dc.date.issued1993-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationIke, Robert W.; O'Rourke, Kenneth S. (1993)."Detection of intraarticular abnormalities in osteoarthritis of the knee." Arthritis & Rheumatism 36(10): 1353-1363. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/37795>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-3591en_US
dc.identifier.issn1529-0131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/37795
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8216394&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. To determine whether intraarticular abnormalities in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee can be detected as well by needle arthroscopy as by standard arthroscopy. Methods. Needle arthroscopy followed by standard arthroscopy was performed on 10 patients with knee OA (diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology criteria) whose symptoms were not entirely attributable to the OA and were therefore an indication for further evaluation. Each knee was assessed for abnormalities of the menisci, articular cartilage (6 sites), and synovium (6 sites). Results. Evaluation of the 18 menisci visualized with both techniques yielded the same results: 6 abnormal and 12 normal. Among the 54 articular cartilage sites evaluable with both procedures, 16 were judged normal by both needle arthroscopy and standard arthroscopy. Of the 38 cartilage sites judged abnormal by standard arthroscopy, 34 (89%) were abnormal by needle arthroscopy. Both techniques indicated cartilage changes were the same at 42 (78%) of the 54 sites; changes at the other 12 sites were 1 grade higher by standard arthroscopy than by needle arthroscopy. Both needle arthroscopy and standard arthroscopy revealed 51 evaluable sites in the synovium. Of 34 areas judged abnormal by standard arthroscopy, 24 (71%) were also judged abnormal by needle arthroscopy; 17 areas were judged normal by both techniques. The 2 techniques assigned the same macroscopic score in 27 (53%) of 51 areas of the synovium, with a higher grade by standard arthroscopy in all but 1 of the other 16 areas. Conclusion. These pilot data suggest that in knee OA, needle arthroscopy can 1) accurately detect meniscal abnormalities, 2) detect cartilage abnormalities, but may underestimate the severity, and 3) detect most synovial abnormalities, but often underestimates the severity. Needle arthroscopy is a potentially valuable rheumatologic tool for the assessment of OA of the knee.en_US
dc.format.extent1167777 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherRheumatologyen_US
dc.titleDetection of intraarticular abnormalities in osteoarthritis of the kneeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Rheumatology, Rackham Arthritis Research Unit and Michigan Multipurpose Arthritis Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor. ; Address reprint requests to Robert W. Ike, MD, Division of Rheumatology, 3918 Taubman Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0358en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Rheumatology, Rackham Arthritis Research Unit and Michigan Multipurpose Arthritis Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid8216394en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/37795/1/1780361005_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780361005en_US
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis & Rheumatismen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.