Show simple item record

Optimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matrices

dc.contributor.authorKim, Byung-Sooen_US
dc.contributor.authorPutnam, Andrew J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKulik, Thomas J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMooney, David J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T16:32:16Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T16:32:16Z
dc.date.issued1998-01-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationKim, Byung-Soo; Putnam, Andrew J.; Kulik, Thomas J.; Mooney, David J. (1998)."Optimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matrices." Biotechnology and Bioengineering 57(1): 46-54. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/37942>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-3592en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0290en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/37942
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10099177&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe engineering of functional smooth muscle (SM) tissue is critical if one hopes to successfully replace the large number of tissues containing an SM component with engineered equivalents. This study reports on the effects of SM cell (SMC) seeding and culture conditions on the cellularity and composition of SM tissues engineered using biodegradable matrices (5 × 5 mm, 2-mm thick) of polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers. Cells were seeded by injecting a cell suspension into polymer matrices in tissue culture dishes (static seeding), by stirring polymer matrices and a cell suspension in spinner flasks (stirred seeding), or by agitating polymer matrices and a cell suspension in tubes with an orbital shaker (agitated seeding). The density of SMCs adherent to these matrices was a function of cell concentration in the seeding solution, but under all conditions a larger number (approximately 1 order of magnitude) and more uniform distribution of SMCs adherent to the matrices were obtained with dynamic versus static seeding methods. The dynamic seeding methods, as compared to the static method, also ultimately resulted in new tissues that had a higher cellularity, more uniform cell distribution, and greater elastin deposition. The effects of culture conditions were next studied by culturing cell-polymer constructs in a stirred bioreactor versus static culture conditions. The stirred culture of SMC-seeded polymer matrices resulted in tissues with a cell density of 6.4 ± 0.8 × 10 8 cells/cm 3 after 5 weeks, compared to 2.0 ± 1.1 × 10 8 cells/cm 3 with static culture. The elastin and collagen synthesis rates and deposition within the engineered tissues were also increased by culture in the bioreactors. The elastin content after 5-week culture in the stirred bioreactor was 24 ± 3%, and both the elastin content and the cellularity of these tissues are comparable to those of native SM tissue. New tissues were also created in vivo when dynamically seeded polymer matrices were implanted in rats for various times. In summary, the system defined by these studies shows promise for engineering a tissue comparable in many respects to native SM. This engineered tissue may find clinical applications and provide a tool to study molecular mechanisms in vascular development. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 57: 46–54, 1998.en_US
dc.format.extent646775 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherChemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherBiochemistry and Biotechnologyen_US
dc.titleOptimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matricesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136 ; Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136 ; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136en_US
dc.identifier.pmid10099177en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/37942/1/6_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980105)57:1<46::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-Ven_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiotechnology and Bioengineeringen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.