Show simple item record

Hepatitis B vaccine: Should we give it a shot?

dc.contributor.authorDickinson, Chris Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Allan Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T16:56:12Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T16:56:12Z
dc.date.issued1993-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationDickinson, Chris J.; Olson, Alan (1993)."Hepatitis B vaccine: Should we give it a shot?." Hepatology 18(2): 458-460. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38398>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0270-9139en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-3350en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38398
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8340077&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective : To determine clinical and economic consequences of alternative vaccination strategies for preventing hepatitis B virus infection (HBV). Methods: Decision analysis was used to evaluate costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of three HBV management strategies (“no vaccination,” “universal vaccination,” and “screen and vaccinate”) in four populations (newborns, 10-year-old adolescents, a high-risk adult population, and the general adult U.S. population). Information on HBV incidence and prevalence, clinical course, and management of acute illness and chronic sequelae was obtained from the literature and a panel of experts. Actual payments (costs) were obtained from Blue Cross/Blue Shield and local pharmacies. Incremental cost-effectiveness was calculated from the perspective of the payer of medical care and subjected to sensitivity analysis. Results: Vaccination (with or without screening) prevents more disease at somewhat increased cost than no vaccination for the neonatal, adolescent, and adult populations. Vaccination (with or without screening) is a dominant strategy in adult high-risk populations (lower cost and greater benefit than no vaccination). Optimal cost-effectiveness, with nonmonetary benefits not discounted, results if all pregnant women are screened for active HBV infection, and HBV vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin are administered to babies born to mothers with positive screening tests. Then HBV vaccine is administered to all children at age 10 and again 10 years later (incremental cost-per-year-of-life-saved relative to the “no vaccination” strategy is $375). A strategy of universal newborn vaccination alone leads to an incremental cost-per-year-of-life saved of $3332. If adolescents are vaccinated at age 10, incremental cost-per-year-of-life saved is $13,938; for the general adult population, the incremental cost-per-year-of-life saved of universal vaccination is $54,524. Discounting benefits will increase cost-per-year-of-life saved 7 to 12 times for all strategies. Conclusions: HBV vaccine is most cost-effective when a strategy of screening newborns is combined with routine administration to 10-year-old children. The means to achieve substantial improvements in the health of the public in a cost-effective fashion are now available and should be pursued aggressively.en_US
dc.format.extent453738 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherW.B. Saundersen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodiocals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherHepatologyen_US
dc.titleHepatitis B vaccine: Should we give it a shot?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–0658en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–0658en_US
dc.identifier.pmid8340077en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/38398/1/1840180234_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840180234en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHepatologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.