Show simple item record

Number of males in primate groups: Comparative tests of competing hypotheses

dc.contributor.authorMitani, John C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGros-Louis, Julieen_US
dc.contributor.authorManson, Joseph H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T16:56:42Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T16:56:42Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationMitani, John C.; Gros-Louis, Julie; Manson, Joseph H. (1996)."Number of males in primate groups: Comparative tests of competing hypotheses." American Journal of Primatology 38(4): 315-332. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38408>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0275-2565en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38408
dc.description.abstractPrimate social groups frequently contain multiple males. Male group size has been hypothesized to result from male mating competition, but the selective factors responsible for the evolution of multimale groups are unclear. Short breeding seasons create situations that are not conducive for single males to monopolize mating access to females, and may therefore favor the formation of large male groups. Alternatively, since the costs of mate defense increase with the spatial clumping of females, female group size may be a primary determinant of the number of males in a primate group. We used comparative methods designed to control for the potentially confounding effects of hidden third variables associated with phylogeny to test the breeding season and female group size hypotheses for the evolution of multimale groups. Our results revealed no association between breeding season duration and the number of males in groups. In contrast, we provide support for the female group size hypothesis by demonstrating a strong pattern of correlated evolution between female and male group size. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent1404706 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropologyen_US
dc.titleNumber of males in primate groups: Comparative tests of competing hypothesesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 46109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/38408/1/3_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1996)38:4<315::AID-AJP3>3.0.CO;2-1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Primatologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.