Show simple item record

Environmental influences on mountain gorilla time budgets

dc.contributor.authorWatts, David P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T16:57:32Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T16:57:32Z
dc.date.issued1988en_US
dc.identifier.citationWatts, David P. (1988)."Environmental influences on mountain gorilla time budgets." American Journal of Primatology 15(3): 195-211. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38424>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0275-2565en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38424
dc.description.abstractData on the time budgets of mountain gorillas ( Gorilla gorilla beringei ) were collected during field studies in the Virunga Volcanoes region of Rwanda and Zaire. Focal sampling was used to determine the proportion of time that individuals of different age/sex classes spent in several mutually exclusive activity states. The gorillas spent the majority of daylight hours feeding; most of the rest of the day was devoted to resting, with little time spent moving or engaged in social activity. The time budget varied among the different subhabitats used by the gorillas, and the gorillas satisfied subsistence needs more quickly when in areas where food was more abundant and/or of better nutritional quality. Silverbacks spent more time feeding than all other age/sex classes, but age/sex class differences were not great. All age/sex classes responded to variability in habitat quality in similar fashion. Unlike the case for many other primates, there was no significant seasonal variation in time budgets. There was a direct relationship between group size and time spent feeding, although variation in relation to group size was lower than that in relation to variation in habitat quality. These results are consistent with the relationship of feeding time to body size in primates. They are also consistent, with other evidence that social foraging entails a cost to gorilla females, but that this cost is low in comparison to those faced by many other primates. Permanent association with males apparently offers little ecological disadvantage to females, who are likely to be more than compensated by mutualistic benefits.en_US
dc.format.extent1201114 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAnthropologyen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental influences on mountain gorilla time budgetsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/38424/1/1350150303_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350150303en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Primatologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.