Show simple item record

Long-term results and complications using augmentation cystoplasty in reconstructive urology

dc.contributor.authorFlood, Hugh D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMalhotra, Sumeeta J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, Helen E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRitchey, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBloom, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Edward J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T17:00:00Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T17:00:00Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationFlood, Hugh D.; Malhotra, Sumeeta J.; O'Connell, Helen E.; Ritchey, Michael J.; Bloom, David A.; McGuire, Edward J. (1995)."Long-term results and complications using augmentation cystoplasty in reconstructive urology." Neurourology and Urodynamics 14(4): 297-309. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38474>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38474
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7581466&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractOne hundred and twenty-two augmentation cystoplasties performed over an 8-year period were reviewed. Mean age at surgery was 37 years (range 2–82 years). There were 82 female patients. The primary urodynamic diagnosis was reduced compliance in 92 (77%) pattenls and detrusor hyperreflexia/instability in the remainder. The clinical diagnostic groups were: spinal cord injury/disease in 32 (27%), myelodysplasia in 27 (22%), interstitial cystitis in 21 (17%), idiopathic detrusor instability in 13 (11%), radiation cystitis in 8 (7%). Hinman-Allen syndrome in 5 (4%), and miscellaneous in 11 (9%). A detubularized, ileal augmentation was used in 82 (67%) patients. In 36 (30%) a detubularized ileocecocystoplasty was fashioned and in the remainder detubularized sigmoid was used. In 19 patients augmentation accompanied undiversion. Sixteen patients had a simultaneous fascial sling for urethral incompetence. Mean follow-up was 37 months (range 6–96 months). There was no postoperative mortality. During follow-up 4 patients died from unrelated causes, 11 have been lost to follow-up, and 5 patients await planned transplantation. Bladder capacity was increased from a preoperative mean of 108 ml (range 15–500 ml) to 438 ml (200–1,200 ml) postoperatively. Of the 106 assessable patients, 80 (75%) had an excellent result, 21 (20%) were improved, and 5 (5%) had major ongoing problems. During the period of follow-up, 17 (16%) patients underwent revision of their augmentation. Twenty-four (21%) patients developed bladder stones and 30% of these did so more than once. Urinary incontinence became manifest in 15 (13%) patients but required surgical treatment in only half of these. Pyelonephritis occurred in 13 (11%) patients. Five patients developed small bowel obstruction following discharge from hospital. There were 7 instances of reservoir rupture in 5 (4%) patients. Augmentation cystoplasty has a pivotal role in the treatment of a broad range of lower and upper urinary tract problems. Careful patient selection and close follow-up are essential. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent770226 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMiscellaneous Medicalen_US
dc.titleLong-term results and complications using augmentation cystoplasty in reconstructive urologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urology, Medical School, University of Texas, Houstonen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urology, Medical School, University of Texas, Houstonen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urology, Medical School, University of Texas, Houston ; Division of Urology, University of Texas Medical School, 6431 Fannin, Suite 6.018, Houston, TX 77030en_US
dc.identifier.pmid7581466en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/38474/1/1930140402_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.1930140402en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.