Which Enterprises (Believe They) Have Soft budgets after Mass Privatization? Evidence from Mongolia
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, James | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Korsum, Georges | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Murrell, And | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-08-01T15:46:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-08-01T15:46:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997-10-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:1997-83 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39473 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | To ascertain the prevalence of soft budgets and to find causes of softness, we surveyed 251 privatized Mongolian enterprises, asking whether state aid was expected when financial difficulties arose. One quarter of the enterprises expected such soft-budget aid, a large proportion of which have central government ownership. We examine causes of soft budgets in addition to state ownership, but the state variable dominates. Results are robust when using either instrumental variables or bivariate probit to unmask unmeasured selection effects. Local government ownership has a much weaker effect than does central ownership. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 33 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3151 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1673077 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 83 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | P11, P21, O53, H70, H20 | en_US |
dc.title | Which Enterprises (Believe They) Have Soft budgets after Mass Privatization? Evidence from Mongolia | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39473/3/wp83.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.