Does the Market Pay Off? Earnings Inequality and Returns to Education in Urban China
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Xiaogang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Xie, Yu | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-08-01T16:31:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-08-01T16:31:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-04-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:2002-454 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39838 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The paper examines earnings inequality and earnings returns to education in China among four types of workers characterized by their labor market history. Compared to workers staying in the state sector, early market entrants no longer enjoyed advantages. The commonly observed higher earnings returns to education in the market sector are only limited to recent market entrants. This results from the aggregation of two very different types of workers: those who were "pushed" and those who "jumped" into the market in later stage of the reform. The findings challenge the prevailing wisdom that education is necessarily more highly rewarded by the market sector. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 92659 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3151 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 378722 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 454 | en_US |
dc.subject | Labor Market, Earnings, Education, China's Transition | en_US |
dc.title | Does the Market Pay Off? Earnings Inequality and Returns to Education in Urban China | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39838/3/wp454.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.