Show simple item record

Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't, and What We Should

dc.contributor.authorCampos, Nauro F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoricelli, Fabrizioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T15:48:21Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T15:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2002-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2002-470en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39854en_US
dc.description.abstractThis essay surveys macroeconomic issues that marked the transition from centrally planned to market economy in Central and Eastern European and former Soviet Union countries. We first establish a set of stylized facts of the transition so far, namely: (1) output fell, (2) capital shrank, (3) labor moved, (4) trade reoriented, (5) the structure changed, (6) institutions collapsed, and (7) transition costs. We then critically survey the theoretical literature on transition, discussing various explanations for the initial output fall as well as medium term issues, such as optimal speed of transition, disorganization, institutions and sectoral reallocation as a source of output dynamics. Last, we review the empirical literature to assess how well it translates the theoretical models and explains the stylized facts. The essay concludes with a succinct list of suggestions for future research.en_US
dc.format.extent186325 bytes
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent221879 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries470en_US
dc.subjectEconomic Growth, Transition Economiesen_US
dc.subject.otherE23, O40, P20, P52en_US
dc.titleGrowth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't, and What We Shoulden_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39854/3/wp470.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.