View Item 

Show simple item record

Why Transition Paths Differ: Russian and Chinese Enterprise Performance Compared
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, Sumon Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorEstrin, Saulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T16:32:39Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T16:32:39Z
dc.date.issued2003-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2003-525en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39910en_US
dc.description.abstractWe use enterprise data to analyse and compare the determinants of enterprise performance in China and Russia. We find that in China, enterprise growth and efficiency is associated with rapid increases in factor inputs including management, as well as TFP, but not greatly associated with ownership or institutional factors. In contrast, sales growth in Russia is not associated with improvements in factor quantity (except for labor) or quality; TFP is not influenced by competition and privatization to outsiders does not enhance company performance relative to insider ownership. The main determinants of TFP are instead demand and institutional factors at a regional level.en_US
dc.format.extent74496 bytes
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent348122 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries525en_US
dc.subjectInformal Enterprise Performance, Privatization in Russia and China, Total Factor Productivityen_US
dc.subject.otherD23, L22, O12, P31en_US
dc.titleWhy Transition Paths Differ: Russian and Chinese Enterprise Performance Compareden_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39910/3/wp525.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Name:
wp525.pdf
Size:
339.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.