Why Transition Paths Differ: Russian and Chinese Enterprise Performance Compared
dc.contributor.author | Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Estrin, Saul | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-08-01T16:32:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-08-01T16:32:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:2003-525 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39910 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We use enterprise data to analyse and compare the determinants of enterprise performance in China and Russia. We find that in China, enterprise growth and efficiency is associated with rapid increases in factor inputs including management, as well as TFP, but not greatly associated with ownership or institutional factors. In contrast, sales growth in Russia is not associated with improvements in factor quantity (except for labor) or quality; TFP is not influenced by competition and privatization to outsiders does not enhance company performance relative to insider ownership. The main determinants of TFP are instead demand and institutional factors at a regional level. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 74496 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3151 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 348122 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 525 | en_US |
dc.subject | Informal Enterprise Performance, Privatization in Russia and China, Total Factor Productivity | en_US |
dc.subject.other | D23, L22, O12, P31 | en_US |
dc.title | Why Transition Paths Differ: Russian and Chinese Enterprise Performance Compared | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39910/3/wp525.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.