Show simple item record

Dowry and Intrahousehold Bargaining: Evidence from China

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Philip H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T16:28:29Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T16:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2003-608en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/39994en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the relationship between a woman’s intrahousehold bargaining position and her welfare within marriage. Simultaneity problems common to the literature are overcome by using dowry to proxy for bargaining position. Omitted variable bias is addressed by using grain shocks in the year preceding marriage and sibling sex composition as instruments for dowry. Instrumented dowry positively impacts several measures of a wife’s welfare, including time allocation, household purchases, and the wife’s decision-making authority, thereby offering strong evidence to support collective models of the household.en_US
dc.format.extent94436 bytes
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent551238 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries608en_US
dc.subjectIntrahousehold Allocation, Dowry and Brideprice, Marriage, Chinaen_US
dc.subject.otherD13, J12, J16, O12en_US
dc.titleDowry and Intrahousehold Bargaining: Evidence from Chinaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39994/3/wp608.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.