Show simple item record

Governance and Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Central And Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States

dc.contributor.authorHartarska, Valentinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T15:57:08Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T15:57:08Z
dc.date.issued2004-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2004-677en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/40063en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the first evidence on the impact of external governance mechanisms, board diversity and independence, and management compensation on outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States. Results indicate that among external governance mechanisms only auditing affects outreach, whereas regulation and rating do not affect performance. Board diversity improves both outreach and sustainability while larger and less independent boards lower sustainability. Performance-based compensation is not effective in aligning the interest of managers and stakeholders, and underpaying managers reduces outreach.en_US
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent919464 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries677en_US
dc.subjectCentral and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States, Governance, Microfinance, Board of Directors, Managerial Compensation, Regulation, and Ratingen_US
dc.subject.otherG21, G32, L22, L31, O16, P23, Q14en_US
dc.titleGovernance and Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Central And Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent Statesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40063/2/wp677.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.